<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agreements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rootsdown.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/agreements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rootsdown.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/agreements/</link>
	<description>Honestly Speaking with humor and a whole lot of sensuality.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vann</title>
		<link>http://rootsdown.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/agreements/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>Vann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rootsdown.wordpress.com/?p=1613#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>To me, by how I would define of M/s relationships, the master has the right to change 
the dynamic of a relationship.

It doesn&#039;t mean it is normally the right thing to do for the master or slave. It doesn&#039;t mean that exercizing that right would cause either party to better meet their needs ot that either party would even meet their needs to the same degree. 

To me, I question the definitions of the one asking the question about whether it was about M/s or D/s.  To me, the question was rigid and had a simple answer. I have found real life relationships to necessitate negotiation and compromise, for me. People do what they do. I do what I do. Much of what I do doesn&#039;t neatly fit into M/s or D/s.  Words are what I use to communicate with, and are extremely important. Using terms interchangeably that have different meanings is not something that is helpful for me. 

I appreciate and agree with the responses of this thread as speaking to what they felt the question to be for them in there experiences and relationships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, by how I would define of M/s relationships, the master has the right to change<br />
the dynamic of a relationship.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t mean it is normally the right thing to do for the master or slave. It doesn&#8217;t mean that exercizing that right would cause either party to better meet their needs ot that either party would even meet their needs to the same degree. </p>
<p>To me, I question the definitions of the one asking the question about whether it was about M/s or D/s.  To me, the question was rigid and had a simple answer. I have found real life relationships to necessitate negotiation and compromise, for me. People do what they do. I do what I do. Much of what I do doesn&#8217;t neatly fit into M/s or D/s.  Words are what I use to communicate with, and are extremely important. Using terms interchangeably that have different meanings is not something that is helpful for me. </p>
<p>I appreciate and agree with the responses of this thread as speaking to what they felt the question to be for them in there experiences and relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
